DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 GMC Yukon vs 2000 Lincoln Mark Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

GMC Yukon

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

79.5–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GMCMakeLincoln
YukonModelMark
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeCoupe
5Seats5
5Doors2

Performance

156 km/hTop speed0 km/h
4807 ccEngine displacement4601 cc
278 HPPower290 HP
393 NmTorque400 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
98 ltFuel tank68 lt
16,8 ltUrban consumption—
13,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption11,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
245/75 R16Tyre size225/60 R16 V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5029 mmLength5265 mm
2004 mmWidth1900 mm
1943 mmHeight1361 mm
2350 KgWeight1715 Kg
2946 mmWheelbase2870 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 GMC Yukon and 2000 Lincoln Mark approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, GMC Yukon leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…