DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 GMC Terrain vs 2015 Mazda CX-9 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

GMC Terrain

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

78.75–78.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GMCMakeMazda
TerrainModelCX-9
2012Model year2015
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3564 ccEngine displacement3726 cc
301 HPPower273 HP
369 NmTorque270 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
79 ltFuel tank76 lt
12,4 ltUrban consumption13,8 lt
9,8 ltExtra-urban consumption9,8 lt
11,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
225/65 R17Tyre size245/60 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4707 mmLength5232 mm
1849 mmWidth1935 mm
1684 mmHeight1727 mm
1723 KgWeight1958 Kg
2858 mmWheelbase2875 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 GMC Terrain and 2015 Mazda CX-9 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, GMC Terrain leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…