DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Mazda CX-9 vs 2012 GMC Terrain Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

GMC Terrain

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

78.5–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeGMC
CX-9ModelTerrain
2015Model year2012
SUVBody typeSUV
7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3726 ccEngine displacement3564 cc
273 HPPower301 HP
270 NmTorque369 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
76 ltFuel tank79 lt
13,8 ltUrban consumption12,4 lt
9,8 ltExtra-urban consumption9,8 lt
—Average consumption11,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
245/60 R18Tyre size225/65 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5232 mmLength4707 mm
1935 mmWidth1849 mm
1727 mmHeight1684 mm
1958 KgWeight1723 Kg
2875 mmWheelbase2858 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Mazda CX-9 and 2012 GMC Terrain approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, GMC Terrain leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…