DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 GMC Terrain vs 2011 Land Rover Range Rover Sport Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Land Rover Range Rover Sport

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

78.75–79.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GMCMakeLand Rover
TerrainModelRange Rover Sport
2012Model year2011
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,3 s
0 km/hTop speed193 km/h
2997 ccEngine displacement2993 cc
264 HPPower245 HP
301 NmTorque600 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
79 ltFuel tank84 lt
13,8 ltUrban consumption—
9,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
11,8 ltAverage consumption9,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
225/65 R17Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4707 mmLength4783 mm
1849 mmWidth—
1684 mmHeight1784 mm
1769 KgWeight—
2858 mmWheelbase2745 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 GMC Terrain and 2011 Land Rover Range Rover Sport approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Land Rover Range Rover Sport leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…