DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Jaguar XJ vs 2012 GMC Terrain Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jaguar XJ

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points.

79.25–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JaguarMakeGMC
XJModelTerrain
2012Model year2012
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

6,4 s0–100 km/h—
250 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2993 ccEngine displacement2997 cc
275 HPPower264 HP
0 NmTorque301 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
82 ltFuel tank79 lt
9,6 ltUrban consumption13,8 lt
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption9,8 lt
7,0 ltAverage consumption11,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size225/65 R17
—ABSYes

Dimensions

—Length4707 mm
—Width1849 mm
—Height1684 mm
—Weight1769 Kg
—Wheelbase2858 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Jaguar XJ and 2012 GMC Terrain approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jaguar XJ leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…