DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 GMC Canyon vs 2013 Toyota Land Cruiser Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

GMC Canyon

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

73.75–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GMCMakeToyota
CanyonModelLand Cruiser
2012Model year2013
Pick-upBody typeOff-road vehicle
5/6Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,9 s
0 km/hTop speed180 km/h
3654 ccEngine displacement3956 cc
242 HPPower281 HP
328 NmTorque385 Nm
5Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
74 ltFuel tank87 lt
13,8 ltUrban consumption14,7 lt
10,2 ltExtra-urban consumption8,6 lt
—Average consumption10,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
4 Hydra-MaticGears5
225/70 R15; 235/75 R15Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5260 mmLength4780 mm
1742 mmWidth1885 mm
1723 mmHeight1845 mm
1886 KgWeight2900 Kg
3200 mmWheelbase2790 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 GMC Canyon and 2013 Toyota Land Cruiser approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, GMC Canyon leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…