DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 GMC Canyon vs 2014 Ford Flex Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Flex

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

80.75–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GMC CanyonSpecificationFord Flex
GMCMakeFord
CanyonModelFlex
2016Model year2014
Pick-upBody typeSUV
4Seats6-7
4Doors5

Performance

GMC CanyonSpecificationFord Flex
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3564 ccEngine displacement3496 cc
305 HPPower364 HP
365 NmTorque475 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

GMC CanyonSpecificationFord Flex
PetrolFuel typePetrol
79 ltFuel tank71 lt
13,8 ltUrban consumption14,7 lt
9,8 ltExtra-urban consumption10,2 lt
—Average consumption13,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

GMC CanyonSpecificationFord Flex
4x4Drivetrain4x4
6 Hydra-MaticGears6
265/70 R16; 255/65 R17; 265/60 R18Tyre size235/60 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

GMC CanyonSpecificationFord Flex
5395 mmLength5130 mm
1886 mmWidth1930 mm
1794 mmHeight1727 mm
2005 KgWeight—
3258 mmWheelbase2995 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 GMC Canyon and 2014 Ford Flex approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Flex leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…