2014 • Ford
Flex
Ford Flex 3.5 V6 (364 Hp) 2014Overall Score81.75/100
2014 Ford Flex vs 2016 GMC Canyon Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • GMC
Canyon
GMC Canyon 3.6 V6 (305 Hp) 2016Overall Score80.75/100
WINNER
Ford Flex
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
81.75–80.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford FlexSpecificationGMC Canyon
FordMakeGMC
FlexModelCanyon
2014Model year2016
SUVBody typePick-up
6-7Seats4
5Doors4
Performance
Ford FlexSpecificationGMC Canyon
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3496 ccEngine displacement3564 cc
364 HPPower305 HP
475 NmTorque365 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Ford FlexSpecificationGMC Canyon
PetrolFuel typePetrol
71 ltFuel tank79 lt
14,7 ltUrban consumption13,8 lt
10,2 ltExtra-urban consumption9,8 lt
13,1 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Ford FlexSpecificationGMC Canyon
4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears6 Hydra-Matic
235/60 R17Tyre size265/70 R16; 255/65 R17; 265/60 R18
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford FlexSpecificationGMC Canyon
5130 mmLength5395 mm
1930 mmWidth1886 mm
1727 mmHeight1794 mm
—Weight2005 Kg
2995 mmWheelbase3258 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2014 Ford Flex and 2016 GMC Canyon approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Flex leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…