DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 GMC Canyon vs 2006 Toyota Blade Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Blade

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points.

73.75–74.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GMCMakeToyota
CanyonModelBlade
2006Model year2006
Pick-upBody typeHatchback
6Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h6,6 s
0 km/hTop speed180 km/h
3460 ccEngine displacement3456 cc
220 HPPower280 HP
305 NmTorque206 Nm
5Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
74 ltFuel tank60 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4 Hydra-MaticGears6
205/75 R15; 225/70 R15Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5260 mmLength4220 mm
1742 mmWidth1760 mm
1646 mmHeight1515 mm
1860 KgWeight1250 Kg
3198 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 GMC Canyon and 2006 Toyota Blade approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Blade leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…