DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Jeep Commander vs 2006 GMC Canyon Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jeep Commander

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

74.5–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JeepMakeGMC
CommanderModelCanyon
2006Model year2006
Off-road vehicleBody typePick-up
7Seats6
5Doors4

Performance

9,0 s0–100 km/h—
191 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2987 ccEngine displacement3460 cc
218 HPPower220 HP
510 NmTorque305 Nm
6Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
78 ltFuel tank74 lt
13,5 ltUrban consumption—
9,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears4 Hydra-Matic
245/65R17Tyre size205/75 R15; 225/70 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4787 mmLength5260 mm
1900 mmWidth1742 mm
1826 mmHeight1646 mm
2245 KgWeight1860 Kg
2781 mmWheelbase3198 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Jeep Commander and 2006 GMC Canyon approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jeep Commander leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…