DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 GMC Canyon vs 2006 Jeep Commander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jeep Commander

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

73.75–74.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GMCMakeJeep
CanyonModelCommander
2006Model year2006
Pick-upBody typeOff-road vehicle
6Seats7
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,0 s
0 km/hTop speed191 km/h
3460 ccEngine displacement2987 cc
220 HPPower218 HP
305 NmTorque510 Nm
5Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
74 ltFuel tank78 lt
—Urban consumption13,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
4 Hydra-MaticGears5
205/75 R15; 225/70 R15Tyre size245/65R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5260 mmLength4787 mm
1742 mmWidth1900 mm
1646 mmHeight1826 mm
1860 KgWeight2245 Kg
3198 mmWheelbase2781 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 GMC Canyon and 2006 Jeep Commander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jeep Commander leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…