DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 GMC Canyon vs 2004 Chrysler Concorde Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chrysler Concorde

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–66.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GMCMakeChrysler
CanyonModelConcorde
2004Model year2004
Pick-upBody typeSedan
6Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,8 s
0 km/hTop speed187 km/h
2770 ccEngine displacement2736 cc
175 HPPower203 HP
251 NmTorque258 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
74 ltFuel tank65 lt
—Urban consumption11,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
205/75 R15; 225/70 R15Tyre size225/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5260 mmLength5310 mm
1717 mmWidth1900 mm
1646 mmHeight1420 mm
1569 KgWeight1570 Kg
3198 mmWheelbase2870 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 GMC Canyon and 2004 Chrysler Concorde approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chrysler Concorde leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…