DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Chrysler Concorde vs 2004 GMC Canyon Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chrysler Concorde

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

66.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChryslerMakeGMC
ConcordeModelCanyon
2004Model year2004
SedanBody typePick-up
5Seats6
4Doors4

Performance

8,8 s0–100 km/h—
187 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2736 ccEngine displacement2770 cc
203 HPPower175 HP
258 NmTorque251 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank74 lt
11,8 ltUrban consumption—
8,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
225/60 R16Tyre size205/75 R15; 225/70 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5310 mmLength5260 mm
1900 mmWidth1717 mm
1420 mmHeight1646 mm
1570 KgWeight1569 Kg
2870 mmWheelbase3198 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Chrysler Concorde and 2004 GMC Canyon approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chrysler Concorde leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…