DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 GMC Canyon vs 2014 Volvo XC90 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo XC90

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

73.5–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GMCMakeVolvo
CanyonModelXC90
2015Model year2014
Pick-upBody typeSUV
4Seats5/7
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,3 s
0 km/hTop speed205 km/h
2457 ccEngine displacement2400 cc
200 HPPower200 HP
259 NmTorque420 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
79 ltFuel tank68 lt
12,3 ltUrban consumption10,5 lt
9,0 ltExtra-urban consumption6,8 lt
—Average consumption8,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
265/70 R16; 255/65 R17; 265/60 R18Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5395 mmLength4807 mm
1886 mmWidth1936 mm
1795 mmHeight1784 mm
1805 KgWeight2196 Kg
3258 mmWheelbase2857 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 GMC Canyon and 2014 Volvo XC90 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo XC90 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…