DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 GMC Canyon vs 2016 Mazda CX-4 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-4

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

73.5–74.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GMCMakeMazda
CanyonModelCX-4
2015Model year2016
Pick-upBody typeSUV
4Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

0 km/hTop speed198 km/h
2457 ccEngine displacement2488 cc
200 HPPower192 HP
259 NmTorque252 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
79 ltFuel tank51 lt
12,3 ltUrban consumption—
9,0 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption7,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
265/70 R16; 255/65 R17; 265/60 R18Tyre size225/55 R19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5395 mmLength4633 mm
1886 mmWidth1840 mm
1795 mmHeight1535 mm
1805 KgWeight1545 Kg
3258 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 GMC Canyon and 2016 Mazda CX-4 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-4 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…