DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 GMC Acadia vs 2014 Ford Flex Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Flex

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

80.75–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GMC AcadiaSpecificationFord Flex
GMCMakeFord
AcadiaModelFlex
2017Model year2014
SUV, CrossoverBody typeSUV
7Seats6-7
5Doors5

Performance

GMC AcadiaSpecificationFord Flex
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3649 ccEngine displacement3496 cc
310 HPPower364 HP
373 NmTorque475 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

GMC AcadiaSpecificationFord Flex
PetrolFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank71 lt
13,0 ltUrban consumption14,7 lt
9,4 ltExtra-urban consumption10,2 lt
—Average consumption13,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

GMC AcadiaSpecificationFord Flex
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6 Hydra-MaticGears6
245/65 R17; 235/65 R18; 235/55 R20Tyre size235/60 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

GMC AcadiaSpecificationFord Flex
4917 mmLength5130 mm
1915 mmWidth1930 mm
1745 mmHeight1727 mm
2858 mmWheelbase2995 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 GMC Acadia and 2014 Ford Flex approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Flex leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…