DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Ford Flex vs 2017 GMC Acadia Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Flex

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

81.75–80.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Ford FlexSpecificationGMC Acadia
FordMakeGMC
FlexModelAcadia
2014Model year2017
SUVBody typeSUV, Crossover
6-7Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

Ford FlexSpecificationGMC Acadia
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3496 ccEngine displacement3649 cc
364 HPPower310 HP
475 NmTorque373 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Ford FlexSpecificationGMC Acadia
PetrolFuel typePetrol
71 ltFuel tank72 lt
14,7 ltUrban consumption13,0 lt
10,2 ltExtra-urban consumption9,4 lt
13,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Ford FlexSpecificationGMC Acadia
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6 Hydra-Matic
235/60 R17Tyre size245/65 R17; 235/65 R18; 235/55 R20
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Ford FlexSpecificationGMC Acadia
5130 mmLength4917 mm
1930 mmWidth1915 mm
1727 mmHeight1745 mm
2995 mmWheelbase2858 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Ford Flex and 2017 GMC Acadia approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Flex leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…