DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 GMC Acadia vs 2009 Jeep Commander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jeep Commander

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

76.5–77.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GMCMakeJeep
AcadiaModelCommander
2009Model year2009
SUV, CrossoverBody typeOff-road vehicle
7/8Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

9,1 s0–100 km/h—
172 km/hTop speed180 km/h
3564 ccEngine displacement3701 cc
275 HPPower213 HP
340 NmTorque319 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
83 ltFuel tank78 lt
14,7 ltUrban consumption14,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption12,4 lt
11,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears5
255/65 R18; 255/60 R19Tyre size245/65 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5108 mmLength4787 mm
2004 mmWidth1900 mm
1846 mmHeight1826 mm
2112 KgWeight2080 Kg
3021 mmWheelbase2781 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 GMC Acadia and 2009 Jeep Commander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jeep Commander leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…