DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Jeep Commander vs 2009 GMC Acadia Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jeep Commander

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

77.5–76.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JeepMakeGMC
CommanderModelAcadia
2009Model year2009
Off-road vehicleBody typeSUV, Crossover
7Seats7/8
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,1 s
180 km/hTop speed172 km/h
3701 ccEngine displacement3564 cc
213 HPPower275 HP
319 NmTorque340 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
78 ltFuel tank83 lt
14,7 ltUrban consumption14,7 lt
12,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption11,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
245/65 R17Tyre size255/65 R18; 255/60 R19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4787 mmLength5108 mm
1900 mmWidth2004 mm
1826 mmHeight1846 mm
2080 KgWeight2112 Kg
2781 mmWheelbase3021 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Jeep Commander and 2009 GMC Acadia approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jeep Commander leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…