DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Ginetta G40 vs 2016 Mazda CX-5 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-5

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.5–68.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GinettaMakeMazda
G40ModelCX-5
2016Model year2016
CoupeBody typeSUV
2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

5,8 s0–100 km/h9,2 s
225 km/hTop speed197 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
175 HPPower165 HP
191 NmTorque210 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank56 lt
—Urban consumption7,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,1 lt
—Average consumption6,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
205/40 R17 VTyre size—
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3748 mmLength4555 mm
1642 mmWidth1840 mm
1045 mmHeight1710 mm
795 KgWeight1315 Kg
2250 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Ginetta G40 and 2016 Mazda CX-5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…