1996 • Geo
Tracker
Geo Tracker 1.6 (97 Hp) 1996Overall Score51.5/100
1996 Geo Tracker vs 1996 Seat Ibiza Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Seat
Ibiza
Seat Ibiza 1.9 TDI (90 Hp) 1996Overall Score52.25/100
WINNER
Seat Ibiza
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
51.5–52.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Geo TrackerSpecificationSeat Ibiza
GeoMakeSeat
TrackerModelIbiza
1996Model year1996
Off-road vehicleBody typeHatchback
—Seats5
—Doors3/5
Performance
Geo TrackerSpecificationSeat Ibiza
—0–100 km/h12,0 s
0 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1590 ccEngine displacement1896 cc
97 HPPower90 HP
0 NmTorque202 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Geo TrackerSpecificationSeat Ibiza
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank47 lt
—Urban consumption6,5 lt
—Average consumption4,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Geo TrackerSpecificationSeat Ibiza
—DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
3Gears5
205/75 R15Tyre size185/60 R14
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Geo TrackerSpecificationSeat Ibiza
—Length4109 mm
—Width1640 mm
—Height1408 mm
—Weight1055 Kg
—Wheelbase2440 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Geo Tracker and 1996 Seat Ibiza approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Seat Ibiza leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…