1996 • Seat
Ibiza
Seat Ibiza 1.9 TDI (90 Hp) 1996Overall Score52.25/100
1996 Seat Ibiza vs 1996 Geo Tracker Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Geo
Tracker
Geo Tracker 1.6 (97 Hp) 1996Overall Score51.5/100
WINNER
Seat Ibiza
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
52.25–51.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Seat IbizaSpecificationGeo Tracker
SeatMakeGeo
IbizaModelTracker
1996Model year1996
HatchbackBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats—
3/5Doors—
Performance
Seat IbizaSpecificationGeo Tracker
12,0 s0–100 km/h—
180 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1896 ccEngine displacement1590 cc
90 HPPower97 HP
202 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Seat IbizaSpecificationGeo Tracker
DieselFuel typePetrol
47 ltFuel tank0 lt
6,5 ltUrban consumption—
4,8 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Seat IbizaSpecificationGeo Tracker
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain—
5Gears3
185/60 R14Tyre size205/75 R15
YesABS—
Dimensions
Seat IbizaSpecificationGeo Tracker
4109 mmLength—
1640 mmWidth—
1408 mmHeight—
1055 KgWeight—
2440 mmWheelbase—
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Seat Ibiza and 1996 Geo Tracker approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Seat Ibiza leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…