DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1989 Geo Tracker vs 1986 Audi Coupe Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Geo Tracker

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

51.5–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GeoMakeAudi
TrackerModelCoupe
1989Model year1986
Off-road vehicleBody typeCoupe
—Seats5
—Doors2

Performance

—0–100 km/h11,0 s
0 km/hTop speed172 km/h
1590 ccEngine displacement1781 cc
97 HPPower90 HP
0 NmTorque145 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank68 lt

Transmission & Chassis

—DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
3Gears5
205/75 R15Tyre size175/70 R13

Dimensions

—Length4421 mm
—Width1682 mm
—Height1350 mm
—Weight950 Kg
—Wheelbase2538 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1989 Geo Tracker and 1986 Audi Coupe approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Geo Tracker leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…