DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1989 Geo Tracker vs 1989 Audi 100 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Geo Tracker

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

51.5–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Geo TrackerSpecificationAudi 100
GeoMakeAudi
TrackerModel100
1989Model year1989
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
—Seats5
—Doors4

Performance

Geo TrackerSpecificationAudi 100
—0–100 km/h12,6 s
0 km/hTop speed176 km/h
1590 ccEngine displacement1781 cc
97 HPPower90 HP
0 NmTorque142 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Geo TrackerSpecificationAudi 100
PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank80 lt
—Average consumption8,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Geo TrackerSpecificationAudi 100
—DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
3Gears5
205/75 R15Tyre size185/70 R14

Dimensions

Geo TrackerSpecificationAudi 100
—Length4793 mm
—Width1814 mm
—Height1421 mm
—Weight1160 Kg
—Wheelbase2687 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1989 Geo Tracker and 1989 Audi 100 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Geo Tracker leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…