1989 • Geo
Tracker
Geo Tracker 1.6 (97 Hp) 1989Overall Score51.5/100
1989 Geo Tracker vs 1993 Fiat Croma Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1993 • Fiat
Croma
Fiat Croma 1993Overall Score52.25/100
WINNER
Fiat Croma
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
51.5–52.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Geo TrackerSpecificationFiat Croma
GeoMakeFiat
TrackerModelCroma
1989Model year1993
Off-road vehicleBody typeHatchback
—Seats5
—Doors5
Performance
Geo TrackerSpecificationFiat Croma
—0–100 km/h12,5 s
0 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1590 ccEngine displacement1929 cc
97 HPPower94 HP
0 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Geo TrackerSpecificationFiat Croma
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption3,9 lt
—Average consumption5,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Geo TrackerSpecificationFiat Croma
—DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
3Gears5
205/75 R15Tyre size175/70 R14
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Geo TrackerSpecificationFiat Croma
—Length4520 mm
—Width1760 mm
—Height1430 mm
—Weight1240 Kg
—Wheelbase2660 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1989 Geo Tracker and 1993 Fiat Croma approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Fiat Croma leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…