1996 • Geo
Tracker
Geo Tracker 1.6 16V (95 Hp) 1996Overall Score51.5/100
1996 Geo Tracker vs 1996 Seat Toledo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Seat
Toledo
Seat Toledo 1.9 TDI (90 Hp) 1996Overall Score52.25/100
WINNER
Seat Toledo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
51.5–52.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Geo TrackerSpecificationSeat Toledo
GeoMakeSeat
TrackerModelToledo
1996Model year1996
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
4Seats5
2Doors4
Performance
Geo TrackerSpecificationSeat Toledo
—0–100 km/h12,7 s
0 km/hTop speed184 km/h
1590 ccEngine displacement1896 cc
95 HPPower90 HP
132 NmTorque202 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Geo TrackerSpecificationSeat Toledo
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
42 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption5,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,3 lt
9,4 ltAverage consumption4,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Geo TrackerSpecificationSeat Toledo
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/75 R15Tyre size185/60 R14
YesABS—
Dimensions
Geo TrackerSpecificationSeat Toledo
3620 mmLength4321 mm
1630 mmWidth1662 mm
1654 mmHeight1421 mm
1075 KgWeight1080 Kg
2200 mmWheelbase2471 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Geo Tracker and 1996 Seat Toledo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Seat Toledo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…