DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Renault Megane vs 1996 Geo Tracker Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Megane

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

52.25–51.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeGeo
MeganeModelTracker
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats4
4Doors2

Performance

12,3 s0–100 km/h—
183 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1870 ccEngine displacement1590 cc
98 HPPower95 HP
200 NmTorque132 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank42 lt
6,8 ltUrban consumption—
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,2 ltAverage consumption9,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
185/60 R15Tyre size205/75 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4440 mmLength3620 mm
1699 mmWidth1630 mm
1420 mmHeight1654 mm
1135 KgWeight1075 Kg
2580 mmWheelbase2200 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Renault Megane and 1996 Geo Tracker approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Megane leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…