DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Geo Tracker vs 1996 Seat Ibiza Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Seat Ibiza

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

51.5–52.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GeoMakeSeat
TrackerModelIbiza
1996Model year1996
Off-road vehicleBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
2Doors3/5

Performance

—0–100 km/h12,0 s
0 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1590 ccEngine displacement1896 cc
95 HPPower90 HP
132 NmTorque202 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
42 ltFuel tank47 lt
—Urban consumption6,5 lt
9,4 ltAverage consumption4,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/75 R15Tyre size185/60 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3620 mmLength4109 mm
1630 mmWidth1640 mm
1654 mmHeight1408 mm
1075 KgWeight1055 Kg
2200 mmWheelbase2440 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Geo Tracker and 1996 Seat Ibiza approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Seat Ibiza leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…