1994 • Geo
Tracker
Geo Tracker 1.6 16V (95 Hp) 1994Overall Score51.5/100
1994 Geo Tracker vs 1994 Fiat Croma Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1994 • Fiat
Croma
Fiat Croma 1994Overall Score52.25/100
WINNER
Fiat Croma
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
51.5–52.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Geo TrackerSpecificationFiat Croma
GeoMakeFiat
TrackerModelCroma
1994Model year1994
Off-road vehicleBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
2Doors5
Performance
Geo TrackerSpecificationFiat Croma
—0–100 km/h12,5 s
0 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1590 ccEngine displacement1929 cc
95 HPPower94 HP
132 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Geo TrackerSpecificationFiat Croma
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
42 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption3,9 lt
9,4 ltAverage consumption5,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Geo TrackerSpecificationFiat Croma
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/75 R15Tyre size175/70 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Geo TrackerSpecificationFiat Croma
3620 mmLength4520 mm
1630 mmWidth1760 mm
1654 mmHeight1430 mm
1075 KgWeight1240 Kg
2200 mmWheelbase2660 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1994 Geo Tracker and 1994 Fiat Croma approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Fiat Croma leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…