DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1992 Geo Storm vs 1993 BMW 3 Serisi Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

BMW 3 Serisi

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.5–58.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GeoMakeBMW
StormModel3 Serisi
1992Model year1993
CoupeBody typeHatchback
2Seats5
2Doors3

Performance

—0–100 km/h12,3 s
200 km/hTop speed188 km/h
1588 ccEngine displacement1596 cc
95 HPPower102 HP
131 NmTorque150 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
47 ltFuel tank55 lt
11 ltUrban consumption10,8 lt
7 ltExtra-urban consumption5,9 lt
—Average consumption7,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R14Tyre size185/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4150 mmLength4210 mm
1695 mmWidth1700 mm
1300 mmHeight1393 mm
1035 KgWeight1175 Kg
2450 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1992 Geo Storm and 1993 BMW 3 Serisi approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, BMW 3 Serisi leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…