DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1992 Mazda 323 vs 1992 Geo Storm Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 323

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

58.5–57.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 323SpecificationGeo Storm
MazdaMakeGeo
323ModelStorm
1992Model year1992
HatchbackBody typeCoupe
5Seats2
5Doors2

Performance

Mazda 323SpecificationGeo Storm
8,2 s0–100 km/h—
210 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1840 ccEngine displacement1588 cc
103 HPPower95 HP
155 NmTorque131 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 323SpecificationGeo Storm
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank47 lt
—Urban consumption11 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 323SpecificationGeo Storm
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
185/60 R14Tyre size185/60 R14
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 323SpecificationGeo Storm
4260 mmLength4150 mm
1680 mmWidth1695 mm
1340 mmHeight1300 mm
1120 KgWeight1035 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2450 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1992 Mazda 323 and 1992 Geo Storm approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 323 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…