DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 Geo Storm vs 1990 BMW 3 Serisi Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

BMW 3 Serisi

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.5–58.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GeoMakeBMW
StormModel3 Serisi
1990Model year1990
CoupeBody typeCabriolet
2Seats4
2Doors2

Performance

—0–100 km/h12,0 s
200 km/hTop speed187 km/h
1588 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
95 HPPower113 HP
131 NmTorque162 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
47 ltFuel tank62 lt
11 ltUrban consumption10,3 lt
7 ltExtra-urban consumption6,7 lt
—Average consumption8,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R14Tyre size195/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4150 mmLength4325 mm
1695 mmWidth1645 mm
1300 mmHeight1370 mm
1035 KgWeight1220 Kg
2450 mmWheelbase2570 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 Geo Storm and 1990 BMW 3 Serisi approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, BMW 3 Serisi leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…