DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 Geo Metro vs 1990 Audi 80 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Geo Metro

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

51.5–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Geo MetroSpecificationAudi 80
GeoMakeAudi
MetroModel80
1990Model year1990
HatchbackBody typeSedan
4Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

Geo MetroSpecificationAudi 80
—0–100 km/h14,1 s
0 km/hTop speed168 km/h
1298 ccEngine displacement1595 cc
70 HPPower70 HP
100 NmTorque118 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Geo MetroSpecificationAudi 80
PetrolFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank66 lt
—Urban consumption9,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,5 lt
5,8 ltAverage consumption6,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Geo MetroSpecificationAudi 80
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
125/80 R13Tyre size175/70 R14
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Geo MetroSpecificationAudi 80
3795 mmLength4405 mm
1575 mmWidth1695 mm
1390 mmHeight1395 mm
826 KgWeight1030 Kg
2365 mmWheelbase2545 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 Geo Metro and 1990 Audi 80 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Geo Metro leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…