DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 Audi 100 vs 1990 Geo Metro Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Geo Metro

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

51.25–51.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi 100SpecificationGeo Metro
AudiMakeGeo
100ModelMetro
1990Model year1990
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats4
4Doors2

Performance

Audi 100SpecificationGeo Metro
12,6 s0–100 km/h—
176 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1781 ccEngine displacement1298 cc
90 HPPower70 HP
142 NmTorque100 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi 100SpecificationGeo Metro
PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank40 lt
8,1 ltAverage consumption5,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Audi 100SpecificationGeo Metro
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/70 R14Tyre size125/80 R13

Dimensions

Audi 100SpecificationGeo Metro
4793 mmLength3795 mm
1814 mmWidth1575 mm
1421 mmHeight1390 mm
1160 KgWeight826 Kg
2687 mmWheelbase2365 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 Audi 100 and 1990 Geo Metro approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Geo Metro leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…