DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1989 Geo Metro vs 1989 Audi 80 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Geo Metro

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

51.5–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Geo MetroSpecificationAudi 80
GeoMakeAudi
MetroModel80
1989Model year1989
HatchbackBody typeSedan
4Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

Geo MetroSpecificationAudi 80
—0–100 km/h13,7 s
0 km/hTop speed174 km/h
1298 ccEngine displacement1781 cc
70 HPPower75 HP
100 NmTorque140 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Geo MetroSpecificationAudi 80
PetrolFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank68 lt
5,8 ltAverage consumption7,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Geo MetroSpecificationAudi 80
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
125/80 R13Tyre size175/70 R14

Dimensions

Geo MetroSpecificationAudi 80
3795 mmLength4393 mm
1575 mmWidth1695 mm
1390 mmHeight1397 mm
826 KgWeight1030 Kg
2365 mmWheelbase2546 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1989 Geo Metro and 1989 Audi 80 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Geo Metro leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…