DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1989 Audi 80 vs 1989 Geo Metro Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Geo Metro

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

51.25–51.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi 80SpecificationGeo Metro
AudiMakeGeo
80ModelMetro
1989Model year1989
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats4
4Doors2

Performance

Audi 80SpecificationGeo Metro
13,7 s0–100 km/h—
174 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1781 ccEngine displacement1298 cc
75 HPPower70 HP
140 NmTorque100 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi 80SpecificationGeo Metro
PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank40 lt
7,4 ltAverage consumption5,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Audi 80SpecificationGeo Metro
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R14Tyre size125/80 R13

Dimensions

Audi 80SpecificationGeo Metro
4393 mmLength3795 mm
1695 mmWidth1575 mm
1397 mmHeight1390 mm
1030 KgWeight826 Kg
2546 mmWheelbase2365 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1989 Audi 80 and 1989 Geo Metro approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Geo Metro leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…