1996 • Geo
Metro
Geo Metro 1.0 (55 Hp) 1996Overall Score38.5/100
1996 Geo Metro vs 2000 Hyundai Atos Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Hyundai
Atos
Hyundai Atos 1.0 i (56 Hp) 2000Overall Score39.5/100
WINNER
Hyundai Atos
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
38.5–39.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Geo MetroSpecificationHyundai Atos
GeoMakeHyundai
MetroModelAtos
1996Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
2Doors5
Performance
Geo MetroSpecificationHyundai Atos
20,0 s0–100 km/h15,1 s
140 km/hTop speed142 km/h
993 ccEngine displacement999 cc
55 HPPower56 HP
79 NmTorque82 Nm
3Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Geo MetroSpecificationHyundai Atos
PetrolFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank35 lt
—Urban consumption8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,4 lt
4,9 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Geo MetroSpecificationHyundai Atos
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
145/80 R12Tyre size155/70 R13
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Geo MetroSpecificationHyundai Atos
3745 mmLength3495 mm
1575 mmWidth1495 mm
1330 mmHeight1615 mm
750 KgWeight830 Kg
2265 mmWheelbase2380 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Geo Metro and 2000 Hyundai Atos approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Hyundai Atos leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…