DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Opel Agila vs 1996 Geo Metro Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Agila

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

39.5–38.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Opel AgilaSpecificationGeo Metro
OpelMakeGeo
AgilaModelMetro
2000Model year1996
MinivanBody typeHatchback
4Seats4
5Doors2

Performance

Opel AgilaSpecificationGeo Metro
18,0 s0–100 km/h20,0 s
142 km/hTop speed140 km/h
973 ccEngine displacement993 cc
58 HPPower55 HP
85 NmTorque79 Nm
3Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

Opel AgilaSpecificationGeo Metro
PetrolFuel typePetrol
41 ltFuel tank40 lt
7,5 ltUrban consumption—
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6 ltAverage consumption4,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Opel AgilaSpecificationGeo Metro
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/55 R14Tyre size145/80 R12
YesABS—

Dimensions

Opel AgilaSpecificationGeo Metro
3500 mmLength3745 mm
1620 mmWidth1575 mm
1700 mmHeight1330 mm
940 KgWeight750 Kg
2360 mmWheelbase2265 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Opel Agila and 1996 Geo Metro approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Agila leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…