DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Geo Metro vs 2000 Opel Agila Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Agila

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

38.5–39.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Geo MetroSpecificationOpel Agila
GeoMakeOpel
MetroModelAgila
1995Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
4Seats4
2Doors5

Performance

Geo MetroSpecificationOpel Agila
20,0 s0–100 km/h18,0 s
140 km/hTop speed142 km/h
993 ccEngine displacement973 cc
55 HPPower58 HP
79 NmTorque85 Nm
3Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

Geo MetroSpecificationOpel Agila
PetrolFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank41 lt
—Urban consumption7,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,6 lt
4,9 ltAverage consumption6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Geo MetroSpecificationOpel Agila
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
145/80 R12Tyre size155/55 R14
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Geo MetroSpecificationOpel Agila
3745 mmLength3500 mm
1575 mmWidth1620 mm
1330 mmHeight1700 mm
750 KgWeight940 Kg
2265 mmWheelbase2360 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Geo Metro and 2000 Opel Agila approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Agila leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…