2000 • Hyundai
Atos
Hyundai Atos 1.0 i (56 Hp) 2000Overall Score39.5/100
2000 Hyundai Atos vs 1995 Geo Metro Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1995 • Geo
Metro
Geo Metro 1.0 (55 Hp) 1995Overall Score38.5/100
WINNER
Hyundai Atos
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
39.5–38.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Hyundai AtosSpecificationGeo Metro
HyundaiMakeGeo
AtosModelMetro
2000Model year1995
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats4
5Doors2
Performance
Hyundai AtosSpecificationGeo Metro
15,1 s0–100 km/h20,0 s
142 km/hTop speed140 km/h
999 ccEngine displacement993 cc
56 HPPower55 HP
82 NmTorque79 Nm
4Cylinders3
Fuel & Consumption
Hyundai AtosSpecificationGeo Metro
PetrolFuel typePetrol
35 ltFuel tank40 lt
8 ltUrban consumption—
5,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption4,9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Hyundai AtosSpecificationGeo Metro
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/70 R13Tyre size145/80 R12
YesABS—
Dimensions
Hyundai AtosSpecificationGeo Metro
3495 mmLength3745 mm
1495 mmWidth1575 mm
1615 mmHeight1330 mm
830 KgWeight750 Kg
2380 mmWheelbase2265 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Hyundai Atos and 1995 Geo Metro approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Hyundai Atos leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…