DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Ford Windstar vs 2005 Chevrolet Impala Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Windstar

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

74.5–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeChevrolet
WindstarModelImpala
2003Model year2005
MinivanBody typeSedan
7Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,5 s
175 km/hTop speed200 km/h
3797 ccEngine displacement3791 cc
203 HPPower203 HP
326 NmTorque305 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
95 ltFuel tank65 lt
13,8 ltUrban consumption11,8 lt
10 ltExtra-urban consumption7,8 lt
—Average consumption9,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
205/75 R15Tyre size225/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5125 mmLength5080 mm
1915 mmWidth1855 mm
1790 mmHeight1455 mm
1690 KgWeight1560 Kg
3066 mmWheelbase2805 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Ford Windstar and 2005 Chevrolet Impala approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Windstar leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…