DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Chevrolet Impala vs 2003 Ford Windstar Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Windstar

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

73.75–74.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeFord
ImpalaModelWindstar
2005Model year2003
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
4Doors4

Performance

8,5 s0–100 km/h—
200 km/hTop speed175 km/h
3791 ccEngine displacement3797 cc
203 HPPower203 HP
305 NmTorque326 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank95 lt
11,8 ltUrban consumption13,8 lt
7,8 ltExtra-urban consumption10 lt
9,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
225/60 R16Tyre size205/75 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5080 mmLength5125 mm
1855 mmWidth1915 mm
1455 mmHeight1790 mm
1560 KgWeight1690 Kg
2805 mmWheelbase3066 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Chevrolet Impala and 2003 Ford Windstar approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Windstar leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…