DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Ford Windstar vs 1995 Opel Omega Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Windstar

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.25–58.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeOpel
WindstarModelOmega
1995Model year1995
MinivanBody typeSedan
7Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

13,5 s0–100 km/h12,0 s
180 km/hTop speed200 km/h
2986 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
152 HPPower131 HP
252 NmTorque250 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
95 ltFuel tank75 lt
15,4 ltUrban consumption10,9 lt
8,5 ltExtra-urban consumption6,1 lt
—Average consumption8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
205/75 R15Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5125 mmLength4785 mm
1915 mmWidth1785 mm
1790 mmHeight1450 mm
1810 KgWeight1605 Kg
3066 mmWheelbase2730 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Ford Windstar and 1995 Opel Omega approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Windstar leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…