DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Alfa Romeo 164 vs 1995 Ford Windstar Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Windstar

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

58.5–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakeFord
164ModelWindstar
1995Model year1995
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
4Doors4

Performance

10,8 s0–100 km/h13,5 s
202 km/hTop speed180 km/h
2499 ccEngine displacement2986 cc
125 HPPower152 HP
288 NmTorque252 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank95 lt
8,2 ltUrban consumption15,4 lt
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption8,5 lt
6,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
195/65 R15Tyre size205/75 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4565 mmLength5125 mm
1760 mmWidth1915 mm
1390 mmHeight1790 mm
1490 KgWeight1810 Kg
2660 mmWheelbase3066 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Alfa Romeo 164 and 1995 Ford Windstar approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Windstar leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…