DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Ford Thunderbird vs 2002 Acura RL Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Acura RL

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

75.75–76.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeAcura
ThunderbirdModelRL
2002Model year2002
CabrioletBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

6,8 s0–100 km/h—
220 km/hTop speed210 km/h
3950 ccEngine displacement3494 cc
283 HPPower228 HP
388 NmTorque313 Nm
8Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank68 lt
13,8 ltUrban consumption13,1 lt
10,3 ltExtra-urban consumption9,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
235/50 R17Tyre size225/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4730 mmLength4995 mm
1829 mmWidth1822 mm
1323 mmHeight1435 mm
1748 KgWeight1780 Kg
2723 mmWheelbase2910 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Ford Thunderbird and 2002 Acura RL approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Acura RL leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…