DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Acura RL vs 2002 Ford Thunderbird Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Acura RL

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

76.75–75.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AcuraMakeFord
RLModelThunderbird
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2
4Doors2

Performance

—0–100 km/h6,8 s
210 km/hTop speed220 km/h
3494 ccEngine displacement3950 cc
228 HPPower283 HP
313 NmTorque388 Nm
6Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank68 lt
13,1 ltUrban consumption13,8 lt
9,8 ltExtra-urban consumption10,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
225/55 R16Tyre size235/50 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4995 mmLength4730 mm
1822 mmWidth1829 mm
1435 mmHeight1323 mm
1780 KgWeight1748 Kg
2910 mmWheelbase2723 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Acura RL and 2002 Ford Thunderbird approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Acura RL leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…