DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2001 Ford Thunderbird vs 2003 BMW X3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

BMW X3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 3 points.

75.75–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeBMW
ThunderbirdModelX3
2001Model year2003
CabrioletBody typeSUV
2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

7,0 s0–100 km/h7,9 s
210 km/hTop speed210 km/h
3950 ccEngine displacement2993 cc
256 HPPower204 HP
362 NmTorque410 Nm
8Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
68 ltFuel tank67 lt
13,8 ltUrban consumption11,1 lt
10,2 ltExtra-urban consumption6,9 lt
—Average consumption8,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears6
215/60 R16Tyre size235/55 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4732 mmLength4569 mm
1829 mmWidth1853 mm
1323 mmHeight1674 mm
1680 KgWeight1835 Kg
2723 mmWheelbase2795 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2001 Ford Thunderbird and 2003 BMW X3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, BMW X3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 3 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…