DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1997 Ford Thunderbird vs 1999 Ford Windstar Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Windstar

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

72.75–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeFord
ThunderbirdModelWindstar
1997Model year1999
CoupeBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
2Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed175 km/h
3797 ccEngine displacement3797 cc
234 HPPower203 HP
447 NmTorque326 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank95 lt
—Urban consumption13,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption10 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
225/60 R16VTyre size205/75 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5088 mmLength5125 mm
1847 mmWidth1915 mm
1333 mmHeight1790 mm
1704 KgWeight1690 Kg
2870 mmWheelbase3066 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1997 Ford Thunderbird and 1999 Ford Windstar approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Windstar leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…