DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1997 Land Rover Discovery vs 1997 Ford Thunderbird Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Thunderbird

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

64.25–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeFord
DiscoveryModelThunderbird
1997Model year1997
Off-road vehicleBody typeCoupe
5Seats5
3Doors2

Performance

12,8 s0–100 km/h—
171 km/hTop speed180 km/h
3532 ccEngine displacement3797 cc
155 HPPower141 HP
261 NmTorque292 Nm
8Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
82 ltFuel tank72 lt
19,1 ltUrban consumption—
10,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
14,9 ltAverage consumption12 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
205/80 R16Tyre size205/70 R15 H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4520 mmLength5088 mm
1795 mmWidth1847 mm
1915 mmHeight1333 mm
1925 KgWeight1619 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2870 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1997 Land Rover Discovery and 1997 Ford Thunderbird approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Thunderbird leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…