DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 Ford Thunderbird vs 1990 Land Rover Discovery Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Thunderbird

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

65.25–64.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeLand Rover
ThunderbirdModelDiscovery
1990Model year1990
CoupeBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
2Doors3

Performance

—0–100 km/h12,8 s
180 km/hTop speed171 km/h
3797 ccEngine displacement3532 cc
141 HPPower155 HP
292 NmTorque261 Nm
6Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank82 lt
—Urban consumption19,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption10,5 lt
12 ltAverage consumption14,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears5
205/70 R15 HTyre size205/80 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5088 mmLength4520 mm
1847 mmWidth1795 mm
1333 mmHeight1915 mm
1619 KgWeight1925 Kg
2870 mmWheelbase2540 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 Ford Thunderbird and 1990 Land Rover Discovery approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Thunderbird leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…